|
Poster:
|
Lou Davenport |
Date:
|
March 31, 2012 06:09:34pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: FLAC to MP3 |
foobar2000 does it, keeping the metadata, I think.
|
Poster:
|
dark.starz |
Date:
|
April 01, 2012 07:16:55am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: FLAC to MP3 |
Best sounding library program - JRMC Media
Best playback sound quality - JPlay
Best CD to WAV ripping program - dBPA, JRMC, Foobar 2000
(both JRMC and dBPA are capable of tagging WAV rips with ID3 metadata, dBPA provides the fastest rips)
Best CD to FLAC ripping program - JRMC
Best burning to CDR program - JRMC
Best sounding CDR for burning - Mitsui MAM-A Gold
Best Flac to WAV converter - Foobar 2000
|
Poster:
|
Arbuthnot |
Date:
|
April 01, 2012 08:08:55am |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: FLAC to MP3 |
you might want to re-read wisconsindead's post, particularly the word 'free'
|
Poster:
|
dark.starz |
Date:
|
April 01, 2012 10:21:45pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: FLAC to MP3 |
I can read, just an attempt to influence Wisconsin into considering NAS as it relates to both his present and future needs.
When the rate of sampling is lowered, the file size can be reduced at the expense of lower quality sound. MP-3 files often delete as much as 90 percent of the data of the original music file.
One day down the road, many moons from now, Wisconsin may have wished that his music files were high resolution. Terabyte dual raid NAS is relatively inexpensive and i'm certain that somewhere there is a Santa Claus.
|
Poster:
|
Arbuthnot |
Date:
|
April 02, 2012 02:47:35pm |
|
Forum:
|
GratefulDead
|
Subject:
|
Re: FLAC to MP3 |
oh, i agree, what with the low cost of drives, it doesn't make any sense to not go with the highest audio quality available; however, sometimes it's perfectly reasonable to have both (lo & hi quality) for the same source, depending on one's media player, device, etc.
TVNews
OpenLibrary